Who's more creative, experts or the crowd?
نویسنده
چکیده
Prior literature has indicated a remarkable change in the role of the crowd. Gradually, the crowd, in the process of interacting with firms, is no longer limited to providing demand information alone; rather, the crowd sometimes start participating either partially or fully in product innovation. Such change is based on an underlying assumption that the crowd (or customers) would provide creative thinking and thus help firms with product innovation. However, since this assumption has not been formally tested, this paper explores the difference between experts and the crowd in terms of generating creative ideas for products. By launching two experiments on Amazon‟s Mechanical Turk platform and analyzing the resulting data, I found that a difference does exist and is significantly moderated by the extent of information asymmetry embedded across different products.
منابع مشابه
Crowdsourcing Creativity: Generating and Combining Ideas using Crowds
We introduce and test a crowdsourcing technique for creative problem solving. In total, 1853 workers from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk produced 468 ideas for solving the 2010 oil spill problem in the Gulf of Mexico. In our technique, one crowd generated initial ideas, another crowd evaluated the creativity of these ideas, and yet another crowd combined pairs of ideas produced by the previous crowd....
متن کاملWish: Amplifying Creative Ability with Expert Crowds
We present Wish, a system that uses expert members of an online crowd to amplify a user’s ability to carry out complex creative tasks. When presented with an incomplete or rough draft of creative content (for example, writing, programming, or art), Wish finds and recruits an expert to suggest a possible realization of the user’s vision. Wish contributes a new approach to crowdsourcing complex w...
متن کاملConceptual Combination versus Critical Combination: Devising Creative Solutions using the Sequential Application of Crowds
The purpose of this study was to examine the steps involved in the sequential application of crowds to produce creative solutions for social problems. 127 university students generated, criticized, modified, and evaluated text solutions for reducing misinformation on the Internet. One crowd generated solutions based on two ideas randomly paired from previous crowds’ ideas. The other crowd came ...
متن کاملWisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts
In fields as diverse as technology entrepreneurship and the arts, crowds of interested stakeholders are increasingly responsible for deciding which innovations to fund, a privilege that was previously reserved for a few experts, such as venture capitalists and grant‐making bodies. Little is known about the degree to which the crowd differs from experts in judging which ideas to fund, and, indee...
متن کاملMixing Crowd and Algorithm Efforts to Segment Objects in Biomedical Images
We examine how to leverage the efforts of crowds and algorithms to find the boundaries of objects in biomedical images (segmentation). We propose a modular framework, SAVE, which generates candidate segmentations and then employs voting to choose among the candidates. This framework supports integration of both computer vision and crowdsourcing modules. We evaluated four implementations of SAVE...
متن کامل